I presented a paper recently in Dallas suggesting that one can reconcile various apologetic approaches with particular worship models. In reality, I believe the worship gathering is to be primarily about worship but if we believe there is an evangelistic element in worship (or for those who believe this is the primary purpose of the Sunday morning gathering), the apologetic approach used should be a thoughtful one. I used Boa and Bowman’s taxonomy on apologetic approaches (classical, evidentialist, Reformed, and Fideist) as a mechanism for considering various worship approaches. One of my contentions is that many who seek to be evangelistic in their Sunday morning gathering take a Fideist approach (faith over reason), hoping that the artistic appeal of the service will be a primary draw. I certainly am a fan of doing worship art with excellence but Christian music used primarily for aesthetic appeal may not represent a sound apologetic (this view does not necessarily preclude the possibility of using Christian art that primarily has an aesthetic appeal in non-woship venues). Furthermore I contend that the music portion of the service as well as the sermon can be part of a thoughtful apologetic, representing a reformed, evidentialist, or classical approach (or some combination of these). I have encouraged some of my students to comment on this topic but I’d like to hear your views regardless of your church minisry statas.